Dickens in the news

DICKENS IN THE NEWS


There is so much Dickensy stuff going on this year, the 200th anniversary of his birth. When I come across something that might be interesting to you, I'll put a link to it here. Another reward for frequently checking the class blog!

There will be a good many productions of
A Christmas Carol about as we head into the holidays, but keep your eyes open for a new movie version of Great Expectations, directed by Mike Newell. For a hopeful review (and a terrific tribute to one reader's love of the novel), read this from today's Irish Times.

David Frum, a political talking head, discusses the relevancy of Hard Times on his Daily Beast blog. He calls it a "pre-buttal" of Paul Ryan's fave novel.


A fascinating radio conversation with author Ruth Richardson about Dickens and the workhouse, with special attention to the inspiration for Oliver Twist.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

CONGRATULATIONS

     Class, you've accomplished a lot.  If you've read all the assigned Dickens for this class, you have read over 1348 pages of his fiction (not counting the non-fiction and the critical material, which was significant).  If you didn't read it all, well, you should feel guiltier than Pip leaving town without visiting the Forge.  Hopefully you can go back to the texts in the next week as write and revise your final papers.
     I'd like to dedicate the last blog to a discussion not of a specific passage, but rather to hear about your likes and dislikes.  What was your favorite reading?  Who was your favorite character?  Is there a particular quote that sticks with you?  If Dickens were alive today and sitting next to you on the subway, what would you ask him?  I'd love to hear any and all feedback you have about the course: did you like focusing on a major author? What drove you crazy about Dickens's writing?  Do you have a least favoriate character?  Why?  Did you like the books more as we went along?  If so, why? If not, why not?  Let the discussion begin!

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

The Endings

I want to use the blog this week to talk about the "problem" of the two different endings as well as how this ending does/does not offer a satisfying moral to the other stories (not just the Estella/Pip relationship) being told in the novel, such as those about social change, redemption, the affects of poverty and/or violence on the self, justice in our institutions, etc.  As we said in class, thinking about how you responded to this ending and why asks you to reflect on things Dickens is asking us to think about in other contexts: are victims of social suffering (poverty, violence, hunger, homelessness, orphanhood) responsible for their actions and, if so, to what extent?  If we make these excuses for Estella (or Pip or Magwitch), what do we do with Orlick? or Mrs. Joe?  Or how does it square with the endings of the other novels?  We talked about the neat eradication of all the bad people (though Nancy complicates this) and the rewarding of the good people in Oliver Twist.  We also discussed how Louisa was allowed to come half-way back -- to feel loved and valued but not to have a family of her own.  Is Dickens doing a similar thing here or is this different?

So feel free to close read this passage -- there is a lot of meaningful detail in the scene -- or to speculate on some of the broader issues raised above and in class.  OR BOTH: this is the second-to-last blog!

FROM VOLUME III, CHAPTER XX:

     There was no house now, no brewery, no building whatever left, but the wall of the old garden.  The cleared space had been enclosed with a rough fence, and, looking over it, I saw that some of the old ivy had struck root anew, and was growing green on low quiet mounds of ruin.  A gate in the fence standing ajar, I pushed it open and went in.
     A cold silvery mist had veiled the afternoon, and the moon was not yet up to scatter it.  But, the stars were shining beyond the mist, and the moon was coming, and the evening was not dark.  I could trace out where every part of the old house had been, and where the brewery had been, and where the gates, and where the casks.  I had done so, and was looking along the desolate garden-walk, when I beheld a solitary figure in it.

*         *      *

     "At last it is. I cam here to take leave of it before its change.  And you," she said, in a voice of touching interest to a wanderer, "you live abroad still?"
     "Still."
     "And do well, I am sure?"
     "I work pretty hard for a sufficient living, and therefore -- Yes, I do well."
     "I have often thought of you," said Estella.
     "Have you?"
     "Of late, very often.  There was a long hard time when I kept far from me, the remembrance of what I had thrown away when I was quite ignorant of its worth.  But, since my duty has not been incompatible with the admission of that remembrance, I have given it a place in my heart."

*     *     *

     I took her hand in mine, and we went out of the ruined place; and, as the morning mists had risen long ago when I first left the forge, so, the evening mists were rising now, and in all the broad expanse of tranquil light they showed to me, I saw the shadow of no parting from her.

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

From Volume II, Chapter X

     The garden was too overgrown and rank for walking in with ease, and after we had made the round of it twice or thrice, we came out again into the brewery yard.  I showed her to a nicety where I had seen her walking on the casks, that first old day, and she said, with a cold and careless look in that direction, "Did I?" I reminded her where she had come out of the house and given me my meat and drink, and she said, "I don't remember."  "Not remember that you made me cry?" said I.  "No," said she, and shook her head and looked about her.  I verily believe that her not remembering and not minding in the least, made me cry again, inwardly -- and that is the sharpest crying of all.
     "You must know," said Estella, condescending to me as a brilliant and beautiful woman might, "that I have no heart -- if that has anything to do with my memory."
     I got through some jargon to the effect that I took the liberty of doubting that.  That I knew better.  That there could be no such beauty without it.
     "Oh! I heave a heart to be stabbed in or shot in, I have no doubt," said Estella, "and, of course, if it ceased to beat I should cease to be.  But you know what I mean.  I have no softness there, no -- sympathy -- sentiment -- nonsense."

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

From Vol. 1, chapter 3

     "You're not a deceiving imp? You brought no one with you?"
     "No, sir! No!"
     "Nor giv' no one the office to follow you?"
     "No!"
     "Well," said he, "I believe you.  You'd be but a fierce young hound indeed, if at your time of life you could help to hunt a wretched warmint, hunted as near death and dunghill as this poor wretched warmint is!"
     Something clicked in his throat, as if he had works in him like a clock, and was going to strike.  And he smeared his ragged rough sleeve over his eyes.
     Pitying his desolation, and watching him as he gradually settled down upon the pie, I made bold to say, "I am glad you enjoy it."
     "Did you speak?"
     "I said I was glad you enjoyed it."
     "Thankee, my boy. I do."
     I had often watched a large dog of ours eating his food; and I now noticed a decided similarity between the dog's way of eating and the man's.  The man took strong sharp sudden bites, just like the dog.  He swallowed or rather snapped up, every mouthful, too soon and too fast; and he looked sideways here and there while he ate, as if he thought there was a danger in every direction, of somebody's coming to take the pie away.  He was altogether too unsettled in his mind over it, to appreciate it comfortably, I thought, or to have anybody to dine with him, without making a chop with his jaws at the visitor.  In all of which particulars he was very like the dog.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

From Book Two, Chapter IX

Neither, as she approached her old home now, did any of the best influences of old home descend upon her.  The dreams of childhood -- its airy fables, its graceful, beautiful, humane, impossible adornments of the world beyond: so good to be believed in once, so good to be remembered when out-grown, for then the least among them rises to the stature of a great Charity in the heart, suffering little children to come into the midst of it, and to keep with their pure hands a garden in the stony ways of this world, wherein it were better for all the children of Adam that they should oftener sun themselves, simple and trustful, and not worldly-wise -- what had she to do with these?  Remembrances of how she had journeyed to the little that she knew, by the enchanted roads of what she and millions of innocent creatures had hoped and imagined; of how, first coming upon Reason through the tender light of Fancy, she had seen it a beneficent god, deferring to gods as great as itself: not a grim Idol, cruel and cold, with its victims bound hand to foot, and its big dumb shape set up with a sightless stare, never to be moved by anything, but so many calculated tons of leverage -- what had she to do with these? Her remembrances of home and childhood were remembrances of the drying up of every spring and fountain in her young heart as it gushed out.  The golden waters were not there.  They were flowing for the fertilization of the land where grapes are gathered from thorns, and figs from thistles.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

From Chapter X "Stephen Blackpool"

     It was a room, not unacquainted with the black ladder under various tenants; but as neat, at present, as such a room could be.  A few books and writings were on an old bureau in a corner, the furniture was decent and sufficient, and, though the atmosphere was tainted, the room was clean.
     Going to the hearth to set the candle down upon a round three-legged table standing there, he stumbled against something.  As he recoiled, looking down at it, it raised itself up into the form of a woman in a sitting attitude.
     "Heaven's mercy, woman!" he cried, falling father off from the figure. "Hast thou come back again!"
     Such a woman! A disabled, drunken creature, barely able to preserve her sitting posture by steadying herself with one begrimed hand on the floor, while the other was so purposeless in trying to push away her tangled hair from her face, that it only blinded her the more with the dirt upon it.  A creature so foul to look at, in her tatters, stains and splashes, but so much fouler than that in her moral infamy, that it was a shameful thing even to see her (103).

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

From Chapter 2, "Murdering the Innocents"

"The square finger, moving here and there, lighted suddenly on Bitzer, perhaps because he chanced to sit in the same ray of sunlight which, darting in at one of the bare windows of the intensely whitewashed room, irradiated Sissy.  For, the boys and girls sat on the face of the inclined plane in two compact bodies, divided up the centre by a narrow interval; and Sissy, being at the corner of a row on the sunny side, came in for the beginning of a sunbeam, of which Bitzer, being at the corner of a row on the other side, a few rows in advance, caught the end.  But, whereas the girl was so dark-eyed and dark-haired, that she seemed to receive a deeper and more lustrous colour from the sun, when it shone upon her, the boy was so light-eyed and light-haired that the self-same rays appeared to draw out of him what little colour he ever possessed.  His cold eyes would hardly have been eyes, but for the short ends of lashes which, by bringing them into immediate contrast with something paler than themselves, expressed their form.  His short-cropped hair might have been a mere continuation of the sandy freckles on his forehead and face.  His skin was so unwholesomely deficient in the natural tinge, that he looked as though, if he were cut, he would bleed white" (44).

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Dickens Writes Back

Dickens wrote back to the critics of Oliver Twist in his 1841 Preface to the Third Edition of the novel.  He address the question of what makes a fit subject for art (in his case, fiction).  While you can speak to this issue (as you began to do in your Letter to the Editor), pay attention here to the specific language and images  (repetition, tone, sentence structure) he uses to make his argument.

     "What manner of life is that which is described in these pages, as the every-day existence of a Thief?  What charms has it for the young and ill-disposed, what allurements for the most jolter-headed of juveniles?  Here are no canterings upon moonlit heaths, no merry-makings in the snuggest of all possible caverns, none of the attractions of dress, no embroidery, no lace, no jack-boots, no crimson coats and ruffles, none of the dash and freedom with which 'the road' has been, time out of mind, invested.  The cold, wet, shelterless midnight streets of London; the foul and frowsy dens, where vice is closely packed and lacks the room to turn; the haunts of hunger and disease, the shabby rags that scarcely hold together: where are the attractions of these things?  Have they no lesson, and do they not whisper something beyond the little-regarded warning of a moral precept?
     But there are people of so refined and delicate a nature, that they cannot bear the contemplation of these horrors.  Not that they turn instinctively from crime; but that criminal characters, to suit them, must be, like their meat, in delicate disguise.  A Massaroni in green velvet is quite an enchanting creature; but a Sikes in fustian is insupportable.  A Mrs. Massaroni, being a lady in short petticoats and a fancy dress, is a thing to imitate in tableaux and have in lithograph on pretty songs; but a Nancy, being a creature in a cotton gown and cheap shawl, is not to be thought of.  It is wonderful how Virtue turns from dirty stockings; and how Vice, married to ribbons and a little gay attire, changes her name, as wedded ladies do, and becomes Romance."

Monday, September 24, 2012

On Rose and Nancy, a blog post in which Professor Reitz attempts a post with no typos

In all honesty, I am interested in this entire chapter (XL or 40).  These two characters embody much of the problem about character/nature/nuture we were talking about in class and that Dickens must -- on some level -- resolve if he is to "end" (provide closure for) this novel.  What I have excerpted here are the passages I think need particular attention, but you can also comment on the chapter and its "strange interview" as a whole.

The girl's life had been squandered in the streets, and among the most noisome of the stews and dens of London, but there was something of the woman's original nature left in her still; and when she heard a light step approaching the door opposite to that by which she had entered, and thought of the wide contrast which the small room would in another moment contain, she felt burdened with the sense of her own deep shame: and shrunk as though she could scarcely bear the presence of her with whom she had sought this interview.

***

The kind tone of this answer, the sweet voice, the gentle manner, the absence of any accent of haughtiness or displeasure, took the girl completely by surprise, and she burst into tears.
     'Oh, lady, lady!' she said, clasping her hands passionately before her face, 'if there was more like you, there would be fewer like me, -- there would -- there would!'

***

     'I, lady! replied [Nancy]. 'I am the infamous creature you have heard of, that lives among the thieves, and that never from the first moment I can recollect my eyes and senses opening on London streets have known any better life, or kinder words than they have given me, so help me God! Do not mind shrinking openly from me, lady.  I am younger than you would think, to look at me, but I am well used to it.  The poorest women fall back, as I make my way along the crowded pavement.'
     'What dreadful things are these!' said Rose, involuntarily falling from her strange companion.
     'Thank Heaven upon your knees, dear lady,' cried the girl, 'that you had friends to care for and keep you in your childhood, and that you were never in the midst of cold and hunger, and riot and drunkenness, and -- and something worse than all -- as I have been from my cradle; I may use the word, for the alley and the gutter were mine, as they will be my death-bed.'

***

     'Is it possible,' cried Rose, 'that for such a man as this, you can resign every future hope, and the certainty of immediate rescue? It is madness.'

***

    'When ladies as young, and good, and beautiful as you are,' replied the girl steadily, 'give away your hearts, love will carry you all lengths -- even such as you, who have home, friends, other admirers, everything to fill them.  When such as I, who have no certain roof but the coffin-lid, and no friend in sickness or death but the hospital nurse, set our rotten hearts on any man, and let him fill the place that has been a blank through all our wretched lives, who can hope to cure us? Pity us, lady -- pity us for having only one feeling of the woman left, and for having that turned, by a heavy judgment, from a comfort and a pride, into a new means of violence and suffering.'

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The Opening Paragraphs to Chapter 17

Close read the following paragraphs, but also ask yourself: why does Dickens feel the need to make this point now (Nancy has just both kidnapped Oliver and protected him from further abuse)?  Why is this important stuff for the Reader to think about now? What is weird (for you as a Reader) about being addressed this way in a novel?

"It is the custom on the stage: in all good, murderous melodramas: to present the tragic and the comic scenes, in as regular alternation, as the layers of red and white in a side of streaky, well-cured bacon.  The hero sinks upon his straw bed, weighed down by fetters and misfortunes; and, in the next scene, his faithful but unconscious squire regales the audience with a comic song.  We behold, with throbbing bosoms, the heroine in the grasp of a proud and ruthless baron: her virtue and her life alike in danger; drawing forth her dagger to preserve the one at the cost of the other; and, just as our expectations are wrought up to the highest pitch, a whistle is heard: and we are straightway transported to the great hall of the castle: where a grey-headed seneschal [steward] sings a funny chorus with a funnier body of vassals, who are free of all sorts of places from church vaults to palaces, and roam about in company, carolling perpetually.
     Such changes appear absurd; but they are not so unnatural as they would seem at first sight.  The transitions in real life from well-spread boards to death-beds, and from mourning weeds to holiday garments, are not a whit less startling; only, there, we are busy actors, instead of passive lookers-on; which makes a vast difference.  The actors in the mimic life of the theatre, are blind to violent transitions and abrupt impulses of passion or feeling, which, presented before the eyes of mere spectators, are at once condemned as outrageous and preposterous" (129).

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Meet Noah Claypole, OLIVER TWIST chapter V

From Chapter V, pp 33-34

'Yer don't know who I am, I suppose, Work'us? said the charity-boy, in continuation: descending from the top of the post, meanwhile, with edifying gravity.
'No, sir,' rejoined Oliver.
'I'm Mister Noah Claypole,' said the charity-boy, 'and you're under me.  Take down the shutters, yer idle  young ruffian!' With this, Mr. Claypole administered a kick to Oliver, and entered the shop with a dignified air, which did him great credit.  It is difficult for a large-headed, small-eyed youth, of lumbering make and heavy countenance, to look dignified under any circumstances; but it is more especially so, when superadded to these personal attractions are a red nose and yellow smalls.
...
Noah was a charity-boy, but not a workhouse orphan.  No chance-child was he, for he could trace his genealogy all the way back to his parents, who lived hard by; his mother being a washerwoman, and his father a drunken soldier: discharged with a wooden leg, and a diurnal pension of twopence-halfpenny and an unstateable fraction.  The shop-boys in the neighbourhood had long been in the habit of branding Noah, in the public streets, with the ignominious epithets of 'leathers,' 'charity,' and the like; and Noah had borne them without reply.  But, now that fortune had cast in his way a nameless orphan, at whom even the meanest could point the finger of scorn, he retorted on him with interest.  This affords charming food for contemplation.  It shows us what a beautiful thing human nature sometimes is; and how impartially the same amiable qualities are developed in the finest lord and the dirtiest charity-boy.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

From Dickens's letter to The Daily News in 1846

This is from the letter handed out to you at the end of class.  Read the letter in its entirety first and then reflect on SPECIFIC ASPECTS of the writing in these three paragraphs.  You may also wish to consider the SPECIFICS of this form (letter to a daily newspaper with a wide readership).  You do not have to summarize what is going on in the passage.  Remember, comments do not have to be long (but they should be thoughtful and edited for spelling/grammatical errors).

"It consisted at that time of either two or three -- I forget which -- miserable rooms, upstairs in a miserable house.  In the best of these, the pupils in the female school were being taught to read and write; and though there were among the number, many wretched creatures steeped in degradation to the lips, they were tolerably quiet, and listened with apparent earnestness and patience to their instructors.  The appearance of this room was sad and melancholy, of course -- how could it be otherwise! -- but, on the whole, encouraging.

The close, low chamber at the back, in which the boys were crowded, was so foul and stifling as to be, at first, almost insupportable.  But its moral aspect was so far worse than its physical, that this was soon forgotten.  huddle together on a bench about the room, and shown out by some flaring candles stuck against the walls, were a crowd of boys, varying from mere infants to young men; sellers of fruit, herbs, lucifer-matches, flints; sleepers under the dry arches of bridges; young thieves and beggars -- with nothing natural to youth about them: with nothing frank, ingenuous, or pleasant in their faces; low-browed, vicious, cunning, wicked; abandoned of all help but this; speeding downward to destruction; and UNUTTERABLY IGNORANT.

This, Reader, was one room as full as it could hold; but these were only grains in sample of a Multitude that are perpetually sifting through these schools; in sample of a Multitude who had within them once, and perhaps have now, the elements of men as good as you or I, and maybe infinitely better; in sample of a Multitude among whose doomed and sinful ranks (oh, think of this, and think of them!) the child of any man upon this earth, however lofty his degree, must, as by Destiny and Fate, be found, if, at its birth, it were consigned to such an infancy and nurture, as these fallen creatures had!"

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

From "The Streets - Night" (55-56)

What strikes you about this passage? Anything goes: language, images, rhetorical techniques, specific detail, word choice, tone/change in tone, perspective/point of view, characterization, emerging themes, etc.  Of course, no passage exists in isolation, so while I want you to pay attention to the details of this passage, you can (eventually) talk about how it fits (or not) into the piece as a whole.

"That wretched woman with the infant in her arms, round whose meagre form the remnant of her own scanty shawl is carefully wrapped, has been attempting to sing some popular ballad, in the hope of wringing a few pence from the compassionate passerby.  A brutal laugh at her weak voice is all she has gained.  The tears fall thick and fast down her own pale face; the child is cold and hungry, and its low half-stifled waiting adds to the misery of its wretched mother, as she moans aloud, and sinks despairingly down, on a cold damp doorstep.
     Singing! How few of those who pass such a miserable creature as this, think of the anguish of heart, the sinking of soul and spirit, which the very effort of singing produces.  Bitter mockery! Disease, neglect, and starvation, faintly articulating the words of the joyish ditty, that has enlivened your hours of feasting and merriment, God knows how often!  It is no subject of jeering.  The weak tremulous voice tells a fearful tale of want and famishing; and the feeble singer of this roaring song may turn away, only to die of cold and hunger."

Monday, August 13, 2012

A Brief Description of Close Reading

I know that you are seniors and have more than a passing acquaintance with the skill of close reading.  But summer has a way of putting these skills way in the back of our mental closets.  So here is a brief description of close reading from our friends at Harvard: http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~wricntr/documents/CloseReading.html